Firstly, let me say Happy Birthday to Bitcoin Cash and the whole community. In my view, only Bitcoin Cash has the abilty to become sound money for the world.
After the split in November, BCHN is most likely to use the evidence based approach to future changes to the protocol.
There will be a leader (or leaders) leading the project, but in name only, without any powers to dictate direction.
Voting has been ruled out as democracy does not work for software projects, as this could be subject to a sybil attack.
As the evidence based approach seems to be favoured by the community, I have a few questions.
Who will be allowed to suggest future direction and present the evidence?
What happens when the evidence gathered is not good enough to convince the other side?
In this case, it seems to me that the proposed improvement must be put on hold.
I want to make it clear that I personally do not support a split.