MultiversX Tracker is Live!

After stETH got depegged from ETH, AlamedaResearch exited their position yesterday and sold nearly 50,000 ETH. CelsiusNetwork is also running out of Funds to pay back their Investors there are currently $1.5B worth of Requests.

All Cryptocurrencies

by COINS NEWS 169 Views

After stETH got depegged from ETH, AlamedaResearch exited their position yesterday and sold nearly 50,000 ETH. CelsiusNetwork is also running out of Funds to pay back their Investors there are currently $1.5B worth of Requests.

stETH is supposed to be pegged with ETH price currently it's currently trading at 0.94.

"stEth is a staked $ETH in Lido protocol ($LDO) for which you get stETH equal to $ETH. This system also has a possibility of peg/depeg. Now stEth=Eth, but if the depeg happens and stEth becomes cheaper than Eth, the situation will go out of control."

It's already happening. There is a 4-5% discount for sETH that is supposed to be "secured by ether" in one-to-one ratio. Panic in the secondary market

@AlamedaResearch

closed its position and got rid of nearly 50,000 stETH in a matter of hours.

Source: https://twitter.com/WuBlockchain/status/1535205348511928320

The

CelsiusNetwork liquidity is decreasing. There is fewer and fewer funds available to pay back investors who are buying out positions. They have $1.5b of requests https://twitter.com/highrisk_henny/status/1535268210986995713?s=21&t=jF_SMcO2VRcuybDXkARdLA… This “game” has all the big players involved from

Binance

to

@a16z

https://preview.redd.it/g8e1bo8lx0591.png?685&format=png&auto=webp&s=61616a50a479767d64ce8bb4b2274987d3ba77d2

Also, the lack of liquidity arose thanks to several hacks: The first hack happened in May 2021, where 35,000 ETH was lost – worth $70 million. The second loss was on December 1, 2021, after the BadgerDao exploit, where he stored his 896 BTC, worth $54 million Celsius.

On top of that, Celsius had a $LUNA/$UST deposit, at Anchor, for $500 million. The total loss was $624 million and, importantly, it was client money for which Celsius was responsible.

Also, the lack of liquidity arose thanks to several hacks: The first hack happened in May 2021, where 35,000 ETH was lost – worth $70 million. The second loss is on December 1, 2021, after the BadgerDao exploit, where he stored his 896 BTC – worth $54 million Celsius.

After all these losses and hacks, the battered Celsius turns on the HODL mode for its users, thereby delaying the withdrawal of deposits, since now the project does not have enough liquidity to pay off everyone.

To solve its liquidity problem, Celsius went into debt in May 2022, borrowing $76.7 million in $USDC and $18.3 million in Compound to pay back its clients. However, he realized that there would not be enough money to pay everyone, and now, presumably

He can choose two scenarios for the development of events: Option 1 is to sell your stETH for ETH and exchange ETH for stables. Option 2 - use stETH as collateral for stables.

If we assume the implementation of the 1st option, then there will not be enough liquidity in the Curve pool at the moment to exchange all stETH for ETH, since the pool is getting more and more depleted with each sale.

But let's not forget that Celsius already has $1.2 billion in debt to AVVE, along with $2.5 billion of $stETH collateral. And, if market conditions suddenly deteriorate and stETH collapses then the $2.5 billion collateral will be liquidated, putting Celsius in an even riskier position to lose everything.

Source: https://twitter.com/highrisk_henny/status/1535268210986995713
https://twitter.com/TopTradersbyTV/status/1535656059766984710

submitted by /u/naji102
[link] [comments]

Get BONUS $200 for FREE!

You can get bonuses upto $100 FREE BONUS when you:
💰 Install these recommended apps:
💲 SocialGood - 100% Crypto Back on Everyday Shopping
💲 xPortal - The DeFi For The Next Billion
💲 CryptoTab Browser - Lightweight, fast, and ready to mine!
💰 Register on these recommended exchanges:
🟡 Binance🟡 Bitfinex🟡 Bitmart🟡 Bittrex🟡 Bitget
🟡 CoinEx🟡 Crypto.com🟡 Gate.io🟡 Huobi🟡 Kucoin.



Comments