I see a lot of people talk about how BTC will end wars and play a significant role in disincentivizing international conflict, but I'm not seeing it. I don't understand the argument that BTC can end geopolitical violence. How does it end wars? Some countries still have natural resources that another country might want; how does BTC interfere with the inclination for Country A to invade Country B for B's resources? How does BTC interfere with a theocratic state's inclination to oppress its native"heretics", or impose its leaders wills on foreigners?
I'm just not connecting the dots here. Would BTC have prevented the Iraq war? Vietnam war? Rwandan genocide? Yemeni genocide by Saudi Arabia?
[link] [comments]
You can get bonuses upto $100 FREE BONUS when you:
💰 Install these recommended apps:
💲 SocialGood - 100% Crypto Back on Everyday Shopping
💲 xPortal - The DeFi For The Next Billion
💲 CryptoTab Browser - Lightweight, fast, and ready to mine!
💰 Register on these recommended exchanges:
🟡 Binance🟡 Bitfinex🟡 Bitmart🟡 Bittrex🟡 Bitget
🟡 CoinEx🟡 Crypto.com🟡 Gate.io🟡 Huobi🟡 Kucoin.
Comments