Bitcoin Magazine Plagiarized My Work

I was here years ago and just now recently allowed to post again by bashco.

The OG's know me and can help fill in the details. Recently Bitcoin magazine promoted Mark Goodwin to cheif editor based on shinobi's reference and then mark the weasel turned around and made shinobi tech editor.

Shinobi is known for not liking my works as it explains an orientation of bitcoin that doesn't kill fiat via nash's work ideal Money.

Recently bitcoin magazine put out this article: https://bitcoinmagazine.com/markets/introducing-rfk-jr-to-bitcoins-nashian-orientation

It reeks of shinobies editing

but more to the point this is the headline: "OPINION INTRODUCING RFK JR. TO BITCOIN’S NASHIAN ORIENTATION"

This will be a little confusing...that headline is a lie. In that article RFK doesn't appear and no one introduces him to the Nashian orientation. I am the one that coined the phrase nashian orientation to describe MY WORK as an extension of Nash's Ideal Money synthesized with bitcoin.

https://twitter.com/BitcoinMagazine/status/1709635351789162602

I've been ridiculed for YEARS told it has nothing relevant to bitcoin. More recently Mark the weasel did a interview with RFK where RFK explicitly goes off on how he views bitcoin's role in relation to the USD and it EXACTLY describes my work and thus Nash's work. Naturally I asked Mark the weasel if he mentioned Nash's Ideal Money to RFK because Mark is VERY familiar with my work and I have talked with him on occasion about it etc.

Mark the weasel replied that yes he brought it up because he gave RFK the book he wrote that talks about the content of my work (he didn't bring it up he just gave him his book!).

But I wasn't cited. My work wasn't referenced, but it was OBVIOUSLY USED. Mark the weasel just put his name on it and gave it to RFK.Thats the scummiest shit I have ever seen.

​