We all know that Bitcoin and Satoshis are both tokens and coins. Previously, no one cared which partiular bitcoin or satoshi they had, they only cared about the store of value and price. However, which the recent introduction of Ordinals and BRC-20, are satoshis now technically NFTs? If people are willing to pay more for a "rare" satoshi, and actually care to store it, wouldn't that mean it is no longer fungible? A rare sat can't be replaced by a common sat, so the fungibility argument is gone. And as mentioned, any coin is a token, so that test is passed as well. Curious for others thoughts. Personally, I don't care about sat rarity or Ordinals, so to me they are funigble, but I can now see an argument as to how sats could be considered NFTs.
[link] [comments]
You can get bonuses upto $100 FREE BONUS when you:
π° Install these recommended apps:
π² SocialGood - 100% Crypto Back on Everyday Shopping
π² xPortal - The DeFi For The Next Billion
π² CryptoTab Browser - Lightweight, fast, and ready to mine!
π° Register on these recommended exchanges:
π‘ Binanceπ‘ Bitfinexπ‘ Bitmartπ‘ Bittrexπ‘ Bitget
π‘ CoinExπ‘ Crypto.comπ‘ Gate.ioπ‘ Huobiπ‘ Kucoin.
Comments